To the Ministry's main lobby The Ministry Blog
concert setlists

23 February, 2005

AutoLink unfriendly

The latest version of the Google toolbar is out in beta (i.e. finished but subject to revision).  It's only available for Internet Explorer, and I certainly wouldn't recommend that, so I won't bother to offer a link.

One new feature of the toolbar is attracting a lot of attention: the AutoLink button.  If a block of text mentions a street address, the toolbar will render it clickable as a link to an online map (by default, Google's own).  Other information is treated in the same way.  For example, an ISBN will become a link to that book at Amazon.

This replicates the Smart Tags functionality tested by Microsoft and rejected due to user criticism.  Other sites have discussed the issue at length, so I won't, but I do have a concern I haven't seen expressed elsewhere.

'Apologists' (heh – just teasing) point out that the functionality isn't imposed. It's not turned on by default, the user needs to press the AutoLink button before anything happens. Don't want extra links? Don't use the button. Simple.
However, I seem to be unique in approaching this from an entirely different viewpoint: my concern isn't the ability of users to avoid unwanted links but the right of content-providers to opt-out or block links.
As a designer and site owner, I provide some links from my pages, and withhold others. It's my decision, not that of a visitor, and certainly not that of a third-party. If I want to link to Amazon, I'll do so myself; the absence of a link means I don't want there to be one.

You might now realise that my omission of a link in the first sentence of this entry was an illustration of this point. Hypothetically, the technology could (it doesn't now, but it could) be used to convert a mention of the Google toolbar into a link to its download site. A visitor might find that convenient, but as I mentioned in the second sentence, I have a reason not to provide it. The visitor mightn't agree with that reason, but here's the point: I'm not asking the visitor's opinion. This is my website, and I demand the right to offer and withhold links as I choose.

Another hypothetical situation would arise if the ISBN-to-bookshop linking was extended to give the user a choice of retailers, and Waterstones was one of them. Since the hypocritical sacking of Joe Gordon, I'm unwilling to have anything to do with that company. I wouldn't be preventing the visitor from going to the Waterstones website via a different route, but I'd certainly object to my web content – my intellectual property, to get a little precious about it – being used to assist the process. If AutoLinks then linked to the retailer anyway, my site would be generating traffic and revenue for Waterstones, directly against my will. Personally, I don't regard that as acceptable, and don't believe that a visitor's convenience should override my wishes.

This is another example of the (in my opinion) flawed ideology practiced by too many web designers, that the user always has to have control. I disagree, particularly in the case of private, personal sites.

Follow-up: Two anti-AutoLink measures, and one anti-anti-anti-AutoLink measure which blocks AutoLinks even if the user is trying to circumvent the block.

Comments

your articale on the google toolbar is crap.

- Once the page goes to the user IT'S NOT YOURS! their not permently changing your property.

- it's the users fault. google is providing a service that the user chooses to use, i say let the user decided what content the links go to. for god sakes you can choose yahoo, google, or mapquest to display the maps! because you don't like google doesn't mean i can't go their. If i saw an address I'd probably copy and paste it into a map site you hated just because.

- google isn't a monopoly! their performing a service that people want! IT"S FREE! their not taking over your computer, not littering the banners with adverts! people download it and use it because they want to!

Posted by nick at April 12, 2005 11:58 PM

your articale on the google toolbar is crap.

<sigh> Thereby missing the whole point. You have an opinion. Fine. You can hold whatever opinions you wish, and freely express them in private, and in public spaces. However, this isn't one of them. This is my website, my property. I don't have to give your opinions screen space. This isn't a democracy, and the only opinions that matter (here!) are mine. You have no right of reply, it's a privilege, which I can withdraw without any notice if I feel a comment is even vaguely abusive.

Once the page goes to the user IT'S NOT YOURS!

That, quite simply, is wrong, bogus, untrue. The content and presentation are mine, and remain mine for the duration of copyright. On publication, they don't enter the public domain, and are not made available for anyone to freely modify. Think of it as a feature film. You get to watch, to shout at the screen if you must, but you don't get to interact with it – you're a viewer, not the owner or editor.

it's the users fault. google is providing a service that the user chooses to use, i say let the user decided what content the links go to.

To paraphrase an earlier paragraph, I don't give a damn what you say – it's not your site. What you do with your site is your business, and my site policies are mine alone.

for god sakes

And you can keep your deity out of it, too.

you can choose yahoo, google, or mapquest to display the maps! because you don't like google doesn't mean i can't go their. If i saw an address I'd probably copy and paste it into a map site you hated just because.

As I said in the entry, that's fine, but I withhold permission for my content to be automatically modified to assist the process. I can't limit a reader's choice of map website, and wouldn't wish to, but I'm not obliged to participate in external linking.

I have no inherent problem with Google; I even use their site search service to index this site. I object to the functionality, irrespective of provider.

google isn't a monopoly! their performing a service that people want! ITS FREE! their not taking over your computer, not littering the banners with adverts! people download it and use it because they want to!

All irrelevant. I maintain that link provision is a matter for the site owner, not the user and never a third party.

Posted by NRT at April 13, 2005 10:13 AM
.
Site Home Tull Tour History Music Trading Annotated Passion Play
.
Day in the life... Page design and original graphics © NRT, 2003